The Cosmos network, powered by the ATOM token, has been a topic of much discussion lately, especially in the wake of recent challenges. Among these, a notable event was the network's decision to reduce its inflation rate from 14% to 10%, as seen on Mintscan. This strategic move was significant, marking a pivotal moment in the network's approach to managing its token economy. It underscores an ongoing effort to balance inflation with the overarching goal of maintaining a stable and sustainable economic model.
In a previous article, we studied how various tokenomics decisions would impact the economy, focusing on the organic token price, beyond speculation. This study gathers how different inflation rates and the ATOM 2.0 proposal could change the token demand dynamics and thus impact the ATOM token economy.
In this post, we will analyze the potential impact of the Cosmos airdrop on the ecosystem. We draw on lessons learned from the Arbitrum airdrop, examining its influence on new user acquisition, retention rates, and the resulting selling pressure. For a closer look at the Arbitrum airdrop and its effects, visit this other article.
Arbitrum and Cosmos are at the forefront of blockchain innovation, but they tackle the scalability and interoperability challenges with distinct approaches. Arbitrum operates as a layer-2 scaling solution for Ethereum, using Optimistic Rollups to increase transaction throughput while leveraging Ethereum's security. This technology allows for significantly more transactions at a fraction of the cost and time, without sacrificing the robust security model of Ethereum itself. It's akin to adding express lanes to a congested highway; the original road remains secure and intact, but traffic flows much more smoothly.
Cosmos, on the other hand, introduces a more foundational approach to interoperability with its Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol. This innovation allows for the seamless exchange of data and tokens between independent blockchains, fostering an ecosystem of interconnected networks. The vision of Cosmos extends beyond scaling, aiming to create an "Internet of Blockchains", where diverse networks can communicate and transact without central intermediaries. This approach is more like building a network of highways, each with its own rules and governance, yet perfectly integrated into a larger transportation ecosystem.
Both projects have cultivated vibrant communities. For instance, the Cosmos ecosystem reported having 500,000 active accounts and 4 million transactions in a recent month, while Arbitrum recorded around 20 million transactions in the last month, highlighting the significant traction both projects have gained.
Reflecting on the Arbitrum airdrop, we observed a fourfold increase in user acquisition over three months, and a similar increase in transactions in the months following the airdrop, However, user retention was not really improved.
Applying these insights to the Cosmos ecosystem suggests the potential for a significant increase in transaction volume, possibly reaching 16 million per month immediately following the airdrop. Given that the ATOM ecosystem has been generating approximately $125,000 in monthly fees, this surge in activity could see monthly revenues rise to around $500,000, translating to an annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $6 million.
With around 66% of ATOM tokens currently staked, according to ATOMscan, and a market capitalization of $3.5 billion, this equates to about $2.3 billion worth of tokens staked. The projected ARR of $6 million from fees would yield an annual percentage rate (APR) of approximately 0.24%. This figure is substantially lower than the current rewards derived from staking, which are boosted by the 10% inflation rate, suggesting the ATOM ecosystem may require continued incentives from token emissions to encourage staking for a long time until it can achieve self-sustainability.
Analysis of the Arbitrum airdrop reveals that 50% of the distributed tokens were sold within ten months, exerting considerable selling pressure on the market. Applying this to Cosmos, it's plausible to expect that 5% of the airdropped tokens would be sold each month. That means that an airdrop of 10% of the total supply would introduce a selling pressure of 0.5%. When compared to the current selling pressure from inflation, which stands at about 0.8% of the total supply per month, an airdrop amounting to 16% of the total supply would be necessary to exert a comparable impact.
After the Cosmos community decision to reduce the maximum inflation rate from 14% to 10%, a 6% total supply airdrop could introduce an additional 3.6% annual selling pressure, which is less than the reduction in inflation. On the bright side, his approach would prioritize encouraging actual ecosystem usage over merely incentivizing staking for APR.
Proposing an airdrop exceeding 6% of the total supply risks entering a precarious zone, where the potential for adverse market impact escalates. Specifically, distributing more than 16% of the total supply could effectively double the ecosystem's selling pressure. Yet, it's essential to note that the Arbitrum airdrop, which amounted to 12% of its total supply, offers a benchmark, indicating that such a figure lies within a conceivable range without necessarily overstressing the ecosystem.
The impact of the Cosmos airdrop in the selling pressure will obviously depend on its size, but we see that the ATOM token economy has room to resist this impact.
The upcoming Cosmos airdrop stands as a pivotal moment that could significantly influence the ATOM token economy, affecting everything from user engagement to the overall market dynamics. While drawing parallels from the Arbitrum airdrop offers valuable insights, the unique characteristics of the Cosmos ecosystem necessitate a comprehensive and nuanced analysis.
For those interested in exploring these dynamics further, the Cenit Finance simulator engine offers a sophisticated tool for modeling the ATOM economy including its airdrop. This tool can help users and investors get a better understanding of how changes like the airdrop might impact the market position of the ATOM token in the future.
As we continue to observe the evolution of the Cosmos network, the impact of the airdrop will undoubtedly provide critical data points for future strategic decisions, underscoring the importance of adaptive and responsive tokenomics in the ever-evolving landscape of blockchain technology.
.png)